What happens next? Jacqueline reflects on the lack of feedback or continuity in scientific trials…
Meeting 1 Episode 6 – PLEXRP first impressions – Jacqueline
What happens next? Jacqueline reflects on the lack of feedback or continuity in scientific trials…
No navel gazing here. Alexandre is pleasantly surprised by the scope of the ethics consultation…
Getting it right. Kristina emphasises the importance of ethics in scientific research…
How long is too long? Jacqueline wants to know how do you go about ensuring participants in this trial really do give their “enlightened consent”?
So who’s data is it anyway? Jacqueline and Alexandre was to know what happens to the data if a participant in the trial decides not to continue…
Isabelle dispels rumours of a “double life” which leads to an exchange around a haunting professional dilemma…
On the track of trauma – and Renaud begins to feel the impact of SYNERGIES…
Cutting edge research needs money – Isabelle and her PLEX Research Partners discuss the often fruitless task of finding the funds…
Workshop – Australia, April 2016 The Meeting for Minds Workshop was held on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 at Notre Dame University, Fremantle. The Workshop looked to gain input on research priorities of postgraduate researchers in brain sciences, postgraduate trainee psychiatrists & psychologists, and people with lived experience of mental illness who were interested in forging a … Continue reading Workshop – Australia, April 2016